🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to restart nuclear discussions with the United States as long as it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has declared.

The Iranian diplomat said only diplomacy worked, and shared fresh requests had come from go-betweens to restart talks with the Trump administration. He claimed Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran was not yet able to allow the UN nuclear inspectorate to visit attacked atomic facilities for security reasons.

Navigating a Challenging Course

Araghchi is walking a challenging route since Iran wishes not to be seen to be acting from a stance of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had come out stronger defensively and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material on home soil that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Earlier Talks Unexpectedly Concluded

The prior phases of negotiations between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile termination on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Tehran's atomic facilities in a fortnight-long engagement that ended with the American leader declaring the facilities had been eliminated. Subsequently, EU nations employed their authority to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran asserts they have not had a substantial consequence.

Perfect Agreement Proposed

Iranian officials stated they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was settled an Iran-based consortium with American involvement could process nuclear material. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have continued and the US could be assured that Iran's nuclear programme was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been settled in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a logical implication of the cooperative offer. Representatives stated on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with the US representative the US official only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Position

Tehran representatives said the consortium offer was now no longer available, but it seems very probable the proposal could be resurrected in certain ways if discussions restart.

The US president last week stated he had been getting signals that Iran desired to restart talks, but confidentially Iranian officials claim they are not yet receiving consistent overtures from Washington either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of inactivity in the face of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran says negotiations is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his remarks to the gathering, designed to paint the US as a dominant force that abuses the concept of international law, the foreign minister declared the 12-day war showed the dispute could not be settled by armed force. He stated the assaults commenced with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and concluded with an unconditional call for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the first strikes by Israel were executed with complete American awareness and coordination, making trust hard to rebuild.

Negotiations Continues the Final Resolution

The foreign minister stated: "It was not Iran that had deserted diplomacy; it was America and the western countries that had consistently tried to dictate their desires during the negotiations. Diplomacy can still be active and remains the final solution to address disagreements, but its standards, rules and tenets must be adhered to."

"Provided that they speak to the nation of Iran with the approach of dignity and honor, they will get a response in the identical tone."

Repair and Recovery

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the battle of repair and reconstruction, the foreign minister claimed he was assured Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. All our capabilities have been reestablished. We acquired many lessons from this conflict; we have discovered our own weaknesses and the weaknesses of the opponent."

He continued: "We effectively endured this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they aimed to obliterate, remains in place. The facilities and machinery, if eliminated, will be restored; what is essential is the will of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but failed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have grown more resilient, more integrated, and more endorsing of the leadership and the state in the wake of this assault."